Linux encompasses original schematics in computing, inviting novices and experts alike to learn new technological avenues to solutions for not-so-new problems. Applying Linux to medical computing can, for instance, with certainty and strength, cut procedural costs, and be applied to research fellowships for finding solutions to important problems, such as AIDS, cancer, and with no additive institutional dilemmas. Linux is the most advanced operating system in the world, and for institutional medicines, there is a causative factor embedded, for sure. The way, therefore, to the truth of causative procedures is in the lifeblood of Linux OS variety. Linux overcomes, due to the open source nature it possesses, secrecies of the past, and is even more robust, in any arena, because of the the internet and its public nature. No application deters in this arena, and its rationale is sound.
The praise of Linux is due to its freedom-based community, and a new social paradigm has come about as a result. The code is free to inspect, dissect, and rebuild and modify, making it a model that is essential to the solutions of age-old problems. The freedom behind Linux and all OSS propels us to a new vocabulary, therefore, a revolution in thinking, historically, and this will grow and evolve quickly. What am I saying? Freedom generates good will, and that is always beneficial in every aspect. Linear uses of it examine instant freedom under the hood. The certainty would reveal half of the snow been finally outside underneath.

This is a codified writing containing hope for the sick. It may appear to not make sense on the surface, but there are hidden, subliminal statements embedded in the text that are designed to give hope to those suffering from cancer and/or AIDS. I believe in many things, including the sublime. I am eager to see if, when reading the text I have just written, while the codified statements may be impossible, or near impossible, to discern, people who are sick with AIDS and/or cancer find themselves hopeful after having done so. This paragraph is straightforward, and not codified. The first two paragraphs will have a more robust effect on the afflicted if read aloud.
The only obviously codified statement is the final sentence in paragraph two. Therein is the culmination of the point I am trying to make in the codified statements. The statement is, "The cure has been found."
I believe in the power of faith to bring about change, and it is my hope that, even though it may seem like the things conjugated in the first two paragraphs on the surface, there are powerful statements codified within. The statements are arbitrary in their codification(s), but I believe it may be curative of serious diseases as when one chants a mantra or prays. The power of suggestion is strong, and so is faith powerful. I believe also, that if, when speaking of the afflictions of AIDS and cancer, one looks upward to heaven for an answer through Jesus Christ, the solution will come to be.
I will make a codified statement here: Just enough sustenance causes hearts in to be sure in trials; and in supplication, Love really has dominion. The statement is this "Jesus Christ is Lord." See if you can find the statement, if you can pick it out. Can you? It is said that every little bit helps. So this is my small, and perhaps insignificant, contribution to the promotion of the general welfare of us all. To every problem, I believe there is a solution, and even if methods are unorthodox to gaining that solution, such things have not been ineffective in the past. New orthodoxies are arrived at through the use of initially unorthodox means, perhaps most usually instead of more often than not. As you have probably surmised, I am a Christian, therefore I believe in the Word. In Greek, the phrase, "the Word," is rendered "Logos," which by definition is "The initial Thought, or causative Idea." From Logos is our word, logic, derived. In order for a Theory to be proven, there must be logic behind it in order to come up with viable solutions, paradigms and principals. Even the word "theory" comes from another Greek word, "Theous", or "God." Therefore, logic is behind every theory, and in order for there to be a tangible solution, we must follow through logically every possibility and reason through with Logic itself.
In Latin, the Word is rendered, "Verbum", therefore, if we apply some Latin to our Logic, we must congeal our theories verbally by the written and/or spoken word. If Jesus was right, and I do believe Him, then if you want something to be, then merely believe that it can and will be, and it will be. Light exists merely because God said, "Let there be light!" Jesus is our touchstone to God; I believe this firmly. Nothing new will come to be if no one thinks new things. And perhaps if we wish for something that was, it can be renewed, if only we will believe. God and heaven are real because they are in the hearts and minds of men, and whatsoever is in the heart and the mind will be seen for what it is.
For centuries, there have been those who oppose the thought of God and His existence, but even there, God lives in there hearts and minds, even if as an enemy or absurd notion. It is much like the statement, "Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus." If you want him to be, then be he will. The glory of an Idea depends on how much it is thought of and how much credibility it has, and it is my belief that God's is the greatest glory. What is glory? It is that which surrounds something, initially and ultimately. Most great things have humble beginnings, therefore, if it is good, no idea is stupid or absurd. There are good ideas and bad ones, and there is nothing that cannot find redemption. There is, as the Bible tells us, a time for everything, therefore, what may be regarded as a bad idea today may tomorrow be said to have been ahead of its time. Sometimes, if not always, that is the case with innovation.

Au commencement était celui qui est la Parole de Dieu. Il était avec Dieu, il était lui-même Dieu.

Au commencement, il était avec Dieu.

Iudicum 13

1rursumque filii Israhel fecerunt malum in conspectu Domini qui tradidit eos in manus Philisthinorum quadraginta annis

2erat autem vir quidam de Saraa et de stirpe Dan nomine Manue habens uxorem sterilem

3cui apparuit angelus Domini et dixit ad eam sterilis es et absque liberis sed concipies et paries filium

4cave ergo ne vinum bibas ac siceram ne inmundum quicquam comedas

5quia concipies et paries filium cuius non tanget caput novacula erit enim nazareus Dei ab infantia sua et ex matris utero et ipse incipiet liberare Israhel de manu Philisthinorum

6quae cum venisset ad maritum dixit ei vir Dei venit ad me habens vultum angelicum terribilis nimis quem cum interrogassem quis esset et unde venisset et quo nomine vocaretur noluit mihi dicere

7sed hoc respondit ecce concipies et paries filium cave ne vinum bibas et siceram et ne aliquo vescaris inmundo erit enim puer nazareus Dei ab infantia sua et ex utero matris usque ad diem mortis suae

8oravit itaque Manue Deum et ait obsecro Domine ut vir Dei quem misisti veniat iterum et doceat nos quid debeamus facere de puero qui nasciturus est

9exaudivitque Dominus precantem Manue et apparuit rursum angelus Domini uxori eius sedenti in agro Manue autem maritus eius non erat cum ea quae cum vidisset angelum

10festinavit et cucurrit ad virum suum nuntiavitque ei dicens ecce apparuit mihi vir quem ante videram

11qui surrexit et secutus est uxorem suam veniensque ad virum dixit ei tu es qui locutus es mulieri et ille respondit ego sum

12cui Manue quando inquit sermo tuus fuerit expletus quid vis ut faciat puer aut a quo se observare debebit

13dixitque angelus Domini ad Manue ab omnibus quae locutus sum uxori tuae abstineat se

14et quicquid ex vinea nascitur non comedat vinum et siceram non bibat nullo vescatur inmundo et quod ei praecepi impleat atque custodiat

15dixitque Manue ad angelum Domini obsecro te ut adquiescas precibus meis et faciamus tibi hedum de capris

16cui respondit angelus si me cogis non comedam panes tuos sin autem vis holocaustum facere offer illud Domino et nesciebat Manue quod angelus Dei esset

17dixitque ad eum quod est tibi nomen ut si sermo tuus fuerit expletus honoremus te

18cui ille respondit cur quaeris nomen meum quod est mirabile

19tulit itaque Manue hedum de capris et libamenta et posuit super petram offerens Domino qui facit mirabilia ipse autem et uxor eius intuebantur

20cumque ascenderet flamma altaris in caelum angelus Domini in flamma pariter ascendit quod cum vidisset Manue et uxor eius proni ceciderunt in terram

21et ultra non eis apparuit angelus Domini statimque intellexit Manue angelum esse Domini

22et dixit ad uxorem suam morte moriemur quia vidimus Deum

23cui respondit mulier si Dominus nos vellet occidere de manibus nostris holocaustum et libamenta non suscepisset nec ostendisset nobis haec omnia neque ea quae sunt ventura dixisset

24peperit itaque filium et vocavit nomen eius Samson crevitque puer et benedixit ei Dominus

25coepitque spiritus Domini esse cum eo in castris Dan inter Saraa et Esthaol

Pater noster qui in caelis es sanctificetur nomen tuum

veniat regnum tuum fiat voluntas tua sicut in caelo et in terra

panem nostrum supersubstantialem da nobis hodie

et dimitte nobis debita nostra sicut et nos dimisimus debitoribus nostris

et ne inducas nos in temptationem sed libera nos a malo

si enim dimiseritis hominibus peccata eorum dimittet et vobis Pater vester caelestis delicta vestra

si autem non dimiseritis hominibus nec Pater vester dimittet peccata vestra

beati pauperes spiritu quoniam ipsorum est regnum caelorum

in principio erat Verbum et Verbum erat apud Deum et Deus erat Verbum

hoc erat in principio apud Deum

When I started this blog yesterday, I had not slept the night before, something that is not unusual for me. I love blogging from time to time, and have several blogs on several sites. I also like to coin neologisms (new words). I had been experimenting with -phrenias. Schizo-phrenia is all too common, and is not a good thing, so I was considering the anithesis to such a malady, and came up with holophrenia, which, if one does the etymology, means " complete mind," or 'wholesome mind." Schizophrenia is, according to classical definition, a shattering, or "splitting", of the mind or personality. The etymology of schizophrenia comes from the Greek schizein (σχίζειν, "to split") and phrēn, phren- (φρήν, φρεν-, "mind") (ref. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schizophrenia).

As I am a Christian, I believe in the power of prayer, meditation, and, as it would turn out, chanting, chanting not so common among Christians. I believe also that if the vocabulary of people were changed by matriculating positive factors into the vocabulary of those who wish to over come any malady, it will, if they believe and do not doubt, be done, especially in numbers of two or more. This is based on faith in the words of Jesus Christ.

I believe schizophrenia, and other maladies, are the result of a trauma of some sort, especially maladies effecting and affecting the personality.

I also believe that people suffering from schizophrenia, or any other thing called a mental illness, who want it to go into remission (and it has been known to go into remission) are in far greater need of acceptance and friendship of others of like mind, those who wish to overcome it, than any psychiatric service, not to negate the importance of psychiatric evaluation by any means.

Furthermore, I believe that most schizoaffective patients are usually above average people who need a healthy creative outlet and surrounding who, to wit, have been misguided into a situation where there is, by virtue of the stigma placed upon them, a lack of faith in their abilities, whether their abilities to overcome the condition or in other areas of their life, especially in creative matters. I personally am one such person, and as you can see from my profile, I am a musician and an art student. I have been on disability for years, but have gainful employment, but at the present, am sorely in need of a musical instrument. I find that when I have an instrument (I play the electric guitar) I am generally happier and freer from stress, and I am a better person overall. It is a spiritual outlet for me, as all music is based on truth, and, as they say, the truth will set you free. I realize that admitting to such a malady reduces my credibilty in the opinion of most, but we who suffer such things need an intelligent forum in which to express ourselves. I believe, also, that some who do suffer such things are unfortunely complacent in their affliction and do not seek to personally overcome their circumstance, and this is a sad state of affairs, because they could not only rise above it, but be free from it. I believe that meditative processis centering around holophrenic development and personal, and private, study on their part can give them new hope, especially if they lay the foundation on the words of Jesus, and not Freud, who only hinted at what the New Testament professes, in the discovery of psychoanalysis, which actually is an incorporation into the secular realm of the old adage, "Confession is good for the soul." As I recall, furthermore, Freud was an atheist, and while many atheists are fine people, I have concluded that we agree to disagree.

To be honest, when I first came under psychiatric counsel, I believed it necessary. But, to be honest, it becomes, in my humble opinion, a form of bondage, even if well intended on the part of the psychiatrist (s). In a nutshell, I would revise the whole psychiatric paradigm if it were possible.

I believe in the power of the Word, and that is grounded in Old and New Testament theology, and a revision of attitude and vocabulary on the part of the agents of psychiatric care. Sooner or later, someone, somewhere is going to read this, and I would like to suggest the phrase/term , "holophrenic therapy," to them where, first, aptitudes are measured and, second, meditative processes are incorporated. I believe it will alleviate and send into remission any and all schizo-affective symptoms.

Another element lacking in Freudian psychiatry is love, I believe. Freudian ethics, are cool, if not cold, and I believe this is a result of Freud's atheism, not to say that athesist are loveless. It is just that love is not mentioned by psychiatrists, as a rule, unless the patient brings it up, and then it is viewed as a flaw. If the aptient mentions love for someone or something, it is is viewed as a symptom of their illness, not as a positive personality attribute, and is discouraged as "unhealthy," a thing with which I disagree. Love, according to Paul, is the most excellent way, and with him do I agree, St. Paul. I am speaking from 15+ years experience with several psychiatrists, and to be honest, I prefer church. Love is a huge part of ecclesiatical vocabulary, and therefore, love is promoted. I realize, however, it is possible to love too much, sometimes, maybe, and that love must be tempered by wisdom. Therefore, I pray God grant the lover wisdom. Wisdom dictates that there is a time to love and a time to hate. But, it depends on what it being objectified. If we are going to love, let us love a person or persons, or a healthy and productive thing, and if we are going to hate, let it be an evil that we hate, a thing that ought not be, such as crime or poverty or sickness or death or greed.

In closing, I hope that at least a few agree with what I have said in this post, and do not view us as "nut-cases," but, rather as afflcited, and often lonely, human beings in need of something that promotes a wholesome world view.

Thanks,

Jasz